Archive for March, 2008

March 31st 2008
Promotion From Within Can Be Very Difficult For The New Manager

Posted under Career Management

Managers who are promoted from within because they are good performers may not understand that a fundamental change has taken place. 

The changing relationship between a supervisor and an employee, and a supervisor and the organization presents some serious challenges.  Every new manager from within must understand that they bring their reputation from the old organization to the new job.  It is an absolute certainty that calls to the old organization have been discretely made if they are from another department.  If they are from the same department it is even worse.   

The good and the bad are instantly transmitted, and expectations are set based on impressions and relationships base on an old context.  Only an unknown from outside the firm gets a free ride initially, while the group comes to terms with the new person.  From within, those expectations are set from day one. 

The first challenge for the new manager is to change the context.  Successful managers understand that as an individual contributor words counted more as opinion or recommendation.  As managers, words carry far more weight.  And those words can have a direct consequence on each member of the team.  The lesson is to weigh words far more carefully than in the past. 

Many new managers start out with a meeting with their manager to ensure clarity on goals and expectations.  Armed with that, a group meeting to describe what is expected from the organization by upper management can set a foundation.  Remember, goals are not negotiable.  What is negotiable are the methods, resources, timelines, individual contribution and planning that encompass the sum of each role. 

Employees want both recognition and respect for their views.  That means all views should be courteously considered.  Building group cohesion with a common vision toward common goals requires both tact and leadership.  Over time as trust builds, decisions become easier, and explanations are less important.   

Usually, the pressure of delivering results as quickly as possible help determine the transition from a more collegial approach to a more directed approach.  Many managers don’t understand the importance of establishing trust as a foundation for successful leadership. 

Another principle is the importance of being open and honest.  Whenever possible people should remain informed, even when the news is bad.  Openness and honesty are essential in building credibility.  People tend to be remarkably resilient and can handle bad news, but not duplicity.   

Another success criterion is decisiveness.  Too many mangers fail because they confuse being decisive with being arbitrary.  Good managers are called upon to make decisions.  Some of these decisions can be very severe, affecting staffing, salaries, promotions or other factors.  But, the essence of management is the decision process.  There is never enough data, nor is there a lack of opinions by others, but at some point that all must end and a decision must be made.  Good managers have a sense for when to stop and decide, a capability that grows with experience.

Judit Price

No Comments »

March 27th 2008
For career changers to be successful, they must find the career that fits their personality

Posted under Career Planning

Too many people come to me to help them change careers.  For most, a job change, a different boss, new projects or more responsibility may be the answer because a career change really is a big decision and has to be done for the right reasons.  People who genuinely feel little or no passion about their work and simply go through the motions are candidates for career change.  People who believe in the importance of making a meaningful contribution in ways that provide personal, internal pride and satisfaction are the people who should explore career alternatives. However, career changers frequently make common mistakes.·       

  • They assume they must reinvent themselves rather than seek understanding of who they are.·       
  •  They take a very broad approach to “what is out there” rather than establish a clear focus.·       
  • They put too much emphasis on finding security, rather than learning, challenge and growth.·       
  • They focus on less cosmetic matters such as title or staff size, rather than satisfaction and enrichment.

 It is important to also think about those qualities that go beyond quantifiable skills.  Leadership, dealing with pressure, listening skills, and cross-cultural sensitivities are a few examples of abilities or soft skills that can contribute to success in new careers.  Understanding those skills and experiences and the values that accompany them form a baseline that provides a direction and focus for that new endeavor. Non-essential considerations, such as job title, organizational hierarchy, staff size and others pale in comparison to the essential need to find a career path that provides personal fulfillment.   Finally, with a direction, there is a reasonable expectation of growing security and confidence because as the individual grows in the new career the toolbox of expertise through learning and experience can grow. 

Posted By Judit Price

No Comments »

March 27th 2008
Accepting a salary cut may not be a good idea

Posted under Compensation

Applying for a position that pays a lower rate or seeking one in which the candidate offers to take a lower rate of pay thinking that would give them a competitive edge is a bad idea.  Acceptance of a pay cut below market suggests a loss of confidence and a willingness to make a sacrifice that raises flags.  It is naïve to believe that an employer will offer a market rate after a message that salary is negotiable below the prevailing wage.Some job hunters mistakenly believe that agreeing to take a pay cut or work for less is a good strategic move.  It also suggests that companies are more concerned about the salary, rather than quality.  This is simply not true.

Managers that “negotiate” a lower salary tend to congratulate themselves on their negotiation skill, rather than any willingness on your part to come on board.  And, it not only will not be appreciated, but doubts would be raised to the willingness to work for less. 

After accepting a lower rate people quickly understand the mistake they made, especially when they realize others in the organization are making the going rate, and made no sacrifices.  There is no reason to expect a lower salary.  Organizations pay what they must to get the quality employees they need and desire.

Trying to second guess an offer is at best a waste of time and at worst, dangerous.  Salary discussions should commence with the offer, not before.  Focus exclusively on the job, capabilities, interest in the organization and the challenges in pursuing a successful tenure.  Salary discussions are a test of an individual’s self esteem.  Offering or agreeing to a cut or below market rate sends a clear signal that self worth is low. 

Posted by Judit Price

No Comments »

March 27th 2008
Second Life - Virtual Job Interviews?

Posted under Technology

Here’s a fascinating account of a virtual job interview at Second Life.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/jobs/10pre.html?_r=2&ref=business&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

I don’t really see this taking off, but maybe I should set myself up as a Second Life Career Coach! (My avatar’s name is Rita Destiny. Look me up (I never leave Orientation Island. I’m too clumsy).

-Liz Sumner

No Comments »

March 26th 2008
What’s in a Name?

Posted under Branding & Career Management & Career Planning

I just got an email from staffing.org listing relatively new vocabulary for HR: 

“Speak the Language of the C Suite!” Some of the terms are familiar, some less so. Overall, the impression is one of the growing professionalism of the staffing function and, in particular, tying staffing productivity to the business as a whole (ROI).

Some examples listed:

Right and Wrong Staffing Practices, Keys to Staffing Performance: New hire quality, time to start, hiring manager, satisfaction, internal & external recruiting costs

What does all this mean for job seekers? Less reliance on resumes, perhaps, and more on newer assessment instruments? More reliance on professional resumes, perhaps, due to their ability to communicate brand and success stories? Anyway, get ready for HR to upgrade its own performance!

No Comments »

March 9th 2008
Do job seekers and politicans both conduct campaigns?

Posted under Career Management & Career Planning & Job Search & Social Networking

Campaign_2My two favorite indoor “sports” are careers and politics; a recent book written by Chris Matthews makes some interesting observations about the intersection of these endeavors.

Life’s A Campaign: What Politics Has Taught Me About Friendship, Rivalry, Reputation, and Success is the latest book written by this journalist and TV pundit; I renewed it from the Library so I could share a few thoughts that might spark some conversation from readers…
Matthews, (who confesses to his terrible listening skills) , suggests that:

“The whole trick of life is therefore to (a) find people who like you on first meeting, (b) put effort into winning over those people you can, and (c) recognize those whom, to use Donald Trump’s phrase, you need to ‘work around.’ This is what politicians call campaigning. It’s something you’ll find you have to do in life even if you never run in a single election.”

So, what about it - do successful candidates employ similar strategies when seeking career change or transition? Are we correct to refer to the job search process as a campaign?

  • Clearly, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are candidates for the same job? Have you ever competed with a “friendly foe” for the same job? What happened to the relationship after the position was filled? While it is not likely that the outcome of this a contest will result in a “win-win,” must the outcome produce both a winner and a loser?
  • Is there something about the terminology, “job search campaign,” that symbolizes the process as “sport” at the expense of work/life planning?
  • How are the voters and/or the press doing in fulfilling the role of “hiring managers?” Have we referred the right candidates on for the final interview?
  • What role will the Super Delegates play? Are they the Senior Management team or CEO?

What can career changers and job seekers learn from the experience of these political candidates? What can advice can experienced career managers offer to the politicians?

Karen P. Katz

cross-posted on Career Acceleration Notes

No Comments »

March 8th 2008
More Proof of the Importance of Networking

Posted under Networking

CareerXRoads recently released their 7th annual Source of Hire whitepaper. The whitepaper examines how 300,000 new employees were sourced in 2007. Close to 30% of all new hires were sourced through referrals from existing employees, vendors, and alumni. According to the results of the survey, referrals are the #1 method for finding external hires and every third referral turned into a hire. This is just more proof of the importance of building a robust network as part of your career management strategy. Read more about the survey here.

Posted by Barbara Safani 

No Comments »

March 3rd 2008
Adding fuel to the fire….

Posted under Internet Job Search

Wow, my blog on following up with on-line applications really hit a nerve. I am still receiving comments in my inbox. Some expressing the view that it is NOT up to the job seeker to follow-up (my response to that is: Whose job search is it?), some expressing the frustration of trying to follow-up on-line (my response: if you can’t follow-up on-line, then get off-line. Why continue using a system that is in place to screen you out and then act surprised when it does?) My view remains: no one cares if you work again but you. Take the initiative and if you run into a roadblock, go around it. So I was pleased to run across this newsletter article written by Susan Whitcomb, one of my personal heroes in the field of career coaching. This came in as a newsletter rather than a website so I am pasting it here.

Follow Through After Applying Online

It’s not enough to find openings on an employer’s Web site, attach your resume, and click “Submit.” You must follow through and connect with people in the company, preferably the hiring manager or people who influence the hiring decision. Peripheral contacts—those who do not influence the hiring decision directly but have knowledge about the company, the position, or the hiring manager’s preferences—are also be critical to your success.

Ideally, it’s best to find a referring employee prior to applying at the employer’s Web site. When you do, the insider can give you tips about applying. You can also include the person’s name on your online application because most large companies have an employee referral process that earns employees cash and other incentives for referring a new hire.

So how do you find the names of people who work at your target company? Jobseekers are finding that searches using Google.com or social networking sites, such as LinkedIn.com, are paying big dividends.

Once you find names, do not be afraid to get on the phone and talk to people. Telephoning often works better than e-mailing because you can get a conversation going. Don’t worry about looking too forward. Anyone who posts his profile on LinkedIn or has a resume online understands that networking is an important part of career management.

[If] the conversation has gone smoothly, look for ways to advance the relationship, especially if this individual has influence with the hiring manager. For instance, “I wonder if I might stop in and say hello when I interview there next week.” Or, “What’s your schedule like in the coming week. I’d love to buy you a cup of coffee.” Or, “May I mention to Joe, whom I’ll be interviewing with next week, that we had a chance to talk?”If the conversation has gone extremely well, ask for a referral: “Would you be able to let Joe know that we spoke? If you think I’d be a good fit for the company, I’d certainly appreciate a good word, especially if it might benefit you in terms of an employee-referral incentive.”

Any networking you can do prior to the interview will enhance your “familiarity factor.” Networking increases your knowledge about the company, adds to your career credibility, and increases trust levels with your interviewer and prospective coworkers. If you’re neck-and-neck with another top candidate for the position, the familiarity factor will often tip the scales in your favor!

Faith Sheaffer-Thornberry

No Comments »